Plot[ edit ] No Vacancy, a rock band, performs at a nightclub three weeks before auditioning for a Battle of the Bands competition. Guitarist Dewey Finn performs on-stage antics, including a failed stage dive that abruptly ends the performance. They inform him he must make up for his share of the rent or move out.
Gods were not always quite so capable as that, for example in Zoroastrianism good and evil really were fighting against each other and neither was all-powerful. Primitive gods could literally and physically fight against evil.
Omnipotency is incompatible with benevolence. The reasons that such contradictions appear between the existence of god and the existence of aspects of reality is because the whole idea of god is problematic. If there is no god and if suffering and pain result from purely biological effects and the physical laws of the universe, with no underlying divine cause, then the problem of evil disappears.
There is no real "good" and "evil", there is just evolved life, struggling to survive in an uncaring universe. It happens that this atheistic state appears to match perfectly with the truth of the matter.
The Inhumane Effects of the Justifications of Evil 5 christianity judaism There has been a long Christian history of horrible explanations of evil, wherein all blame is put on the victims.
Disabled people, stillborn babies, the suffering of children and adults alike has all, from time to time, been explained as punishment for their sins. If not actual behaviour, then for thought crime, and, sometimes, the punishment itself is in order to prevent some serious sin happening in the future.
The theory goes that God never punishes people through random bouts of suffering by accident: If suffering seems unjust and unfair, then, it is merely the case that God is judging and punishing people for reasons that their fellow Humans do not comprehend.
Thoughts like these kill all sense of compassion and caring, and scupper any chance of granting relief to the victim. Everything is our fault: It is not our job to try and alleviate the pain that God has seen fit to bring upon us! I am sure that most modern, moral, readers, must react in horror to such an inhumane dismissal of evil.
Many may even, through wishful thinking and ignorance, disclaim that no-one has held to such a monstrous justification.
That is, we all deserve punishment simply for being human, until such a time as we are saved, if we ever are. This was not mere philosophizing - the Christian church in the dark ages really did ban medicine and physicians on the grounds that our bodies deserve their pains and diseases.
The same went for childbirth - it is painful and dangerous for women, because God made it that way as a punishment for all women 8 Genesis 3: Their activities were seen as a "direct affront to the divinely ordained pain of childbirth" and, according to a Scottish clergyman, "vitiating the primal curse of women" 9.
For the same reasons, "when the great American discovery of anaesthetics was applied in obstetrical cases, it was discouraged [because] it was an impious attempt to escape from the curse denounced against all women in Genesis iii. Martin Luther, the founder of Protestantism, taught the same: The following statement epitomizes the Christian approach to female welfare: Let them die in childbirth - that is why they are there" This outright dismissal of pain and suffering arises because religious theology cannot answer the fundamental question as to why there is evil and suffering in the world.
The result is a morality that can have a profoundly negative effect on human compassion.The relation of religion to the state is undeveloped in these writings, but Hegel is clear about the supereminent role of the state that stands above all else in giving expression to the Spirit (Geist) of a society in a sort of earthly kingdom of God, the realization of God in the world.
True religion complements and supports this realization. I RECENTLY watched an impassioned minute film on the subject of religion and freedom, made as a kind of personal statement by Jacob Mchangama, a Danish human-rights lawyer. Assess the extent to which religion produces social change (33 marks) Sociologists have mixed views on whether religion promotes social change or inhibits it.
Weber argues that religion is a cause for social change and focuses on Calvinists to demonstrate how religion can lead to social change. 1.
Introduction to the Problem of Theodicy: A Fundamental Contradiction Between a Good God and Reality. #zoroastrianism “ The presence of evil and suffering in the world has even been argued by some philosophers from Epicurus (BCE) to David Hume (CE) to cast doubt on the existence of benjaminpohle.com more modern writers such as Freud and Marx sought to show that religion's.
Asses The View That Religion Always Acts As a Conservative Force In Society’ view that religion always acts as a conservative force in society Many sociologists argue that the religion is a conservative force. The proof that Islam is a religion based on Terrorism.